Acer Aspire E5-772

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
SystemAcer Aspire E5-772  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire E5-772
Memory2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170412
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 16 '23 at 08:52
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Memory 75.2
1-Core 67.4
2-Core 121
54% 87.8 Pts
4-Core 158
8-Core 161
21% 159 Pts
64-Core 166
10% 166 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Acer(1025 0972) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4703
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
3.94% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 6.2
4% 4.23 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 4.7
Splatting 5.9
4% 5.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.94%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 480GB
306GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X01c86
SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 240 299 278 301 301 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
63.8% Good
Read 334
Write 333
Mixed 305
SusWrite 278
70% 312 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 46.9
4K Mixed 24.1
81% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 207
DQ Mixed 189
142% 186 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KNG/4G ACR16D3LFS1KBG/2G 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.6% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 11.6
36% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 10.8
27% 9.47 GB/s
Latency 89.9
44% 89.9 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E5-772 Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-772

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 19% - Very poor Total price: $27
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback