ECS H81H3-M3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardECS H81H3-M3  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140515
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 15 '23 at 20:39
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
64.5% Good
Memory 80.6
1-Core 90.1
2-Core 176
67% 116 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 303
38% 290 Pts
64-Core 300
18% 300 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.13% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 5.1
Parallax 1.8
3% 3.53 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.3
3% 4.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.13%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 300 302 300 297 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 460
Mixed 388
SusWrite 313
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 57
193% 67.5 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 352
267% 358 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 114%
Great: 124%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
886GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 186 183 185 182 183 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 181
Mixed 37.1
SusWrite 184
105% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
139% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 105%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Team-Elite-1600 0423 TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
58.6% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 18
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 18.5
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 79.5
50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81H3-M3 Builds (Compare 363 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS H81H3-M3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback