Alaska A_M_I_

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAlaska A_M_I_  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211019
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 15 '23 at 15:50
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J4125
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
31.5% Below average
Memory 32
1-Core 59
2-Core 112
37% 67.8 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 184
24% 181 Pts
64-Core 185
12% 185 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2121
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.19% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 2.3
2% 2.33 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.1
0% 0.23 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.19%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac S535N4/128GYN 128GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0330A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 47 22 72 29 58 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
61.3% Good
Read 452
Write 392
Mixed 356
SusWrite 56.3
70% 314 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 68.9
4K Mixed 23
100% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 0.8
61% 143 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 76%
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
84GB free
Firmware: 03090004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 126 45 47 47 45 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 434
Write 330
Mixed 299
SusWrite 90.2
64% 288 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 50.8
4K Mixed 34.5
116% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 115
95% 137 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
24.6% Poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 10.3
27% 9.53 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 4.3
11% 3.97 GB/s
Latency 243
16% 243 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A_M_I_ Builds (Compare 598 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Alaska A_M_I_

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback