Asus B85M-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
MotherboardAsus B85M-E  (all builds)
Memory6.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180404
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 15 '23 at 15:38
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 91.4
1-Core 97.5
2-Core 190
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 312
38% 293 Pts
64-Core 302
19% 302 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI HD 4870
Sapphire(174B E115) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.7000
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Lighting 15.5
Reflection 16.6
Parallax 11.3
13% 14.5 fps
MRender 10.8
Gravity 10.8
Splatting 11.4
9% 11 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 158 152 132 118 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Read 175
Write 95.2
Mixed 37.9
SusWrite 126
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 103%
Apacer Portable HDD 1TB
34GB free, PID c004
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 35 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Read 35.6
Write 36.7
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 37.3
49% 35.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.3
77% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 78.C1GET.DF10C 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
33.9% Below average
MC Read 11
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 9.4
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 10.5
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 65.1
62% 65.1 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85M-E Builds (Compare 2,957 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B85M-E - $106

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $343
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback