Gigabyte GA-B550M DS3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics74.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive47.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B550M DS3H  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230601
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 15 '23 at 11:33
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5500-$80
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 91.1
1-Core 163
2-Core 327
104% 194 Pts
4-Core 640
8-Core 968
100% 804 Pts
64-Core 1132
70% 1132 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 105%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Nvidia(10DE 13D3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Lighting 94
Reflection 93.8
Parallax 86.6
77% 91.5 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 81.4
Splatting 74
71% 89 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 250GB
27GB free
Firmware: EJFM90.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,218
Write 904
Mixed 1,130
241% 1,084 MB/s
4K Read 45.5
4K Write 159
4K Mixed 62.7
234% 89.1 MB/s
DQ Read 518
DQ Write 1137
DQ Mixed 650
545% 768 MB/s
Poor: 86% Great: 291%
Self Reliant 128GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0326A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 63 52 62 54 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 417
Write 61.9
Mixed 139
SusWrite 60.5
37% 170 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 31.2
4K Mixed 18.1
83% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 76.1
DQ Write 35.8
DQ Mixed 0.7
15% 37.5 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3200 F4-3000C16-8GVRB 16GB
3600, 3600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 25.6
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 30.1
SC Write 41.4
SC Mixed 33
100% 34.8 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B550M DS3H Builds (Compare 7,149 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550M DS3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $516
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback