Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Talal TAGITOP-UNI C (all builds)
Motherboard	Default Default string
Memory	0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210812
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 14 '23 at 23:31
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	CHL-User
Background CPU	51%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4120 2,420 User benchmarks, average bench 33% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	24% Poor	Memory 28.8 1-Core 42.5 2-Core 72.8 28% 48 Pts	4-Core 112 8-Core 102 15% 107 Pts	64-Core 109 7% 109 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 24% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(1E50 8011) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.13% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 0.7 Parallax 1 1% 0.93 fps	MRender 2.2 Gravity 1.7 Splatting 1.9 2% 1.93 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.13% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
N10C 256GB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 196GB free (System drive) Firmware: H210324a SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 266 252 244 243 234 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	68.7% Good	Read 383 Write 360 Mixed 344 SusWrite 267 76% 339 MB/s	4K Read 23.8 4K Write 44.7 4K Mixed 28.6 96% 32.4 MB/s	DQ Read 181 DQ Write 137 DQ Mixed 155 117% 158 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 2x2GB 5,404 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	17% Very poor	MC Read 5.5 MC Write 7.5 MC Mixed 6.3 18% 6.43 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 2.4 8% 2.87 GB/s	Latency 262 15% 262 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 17% Great: 27%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 33%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N4120IntelBench 33%, 2,420 samples	2x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	2x

SSD
N10C 256GBBench 65%, 27 samples	2x

RAM
123456789012345678 2x2GBABCDBench 19%, 5,404 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16