Lenovo 23258BA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 23258BA  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 23258BA
Memory1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190924
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJun 14 '23 at 18:10
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
34.2% Below average
Memory 44.6
1-Core 70.7
2-Core 125
45% 80.2 Pts
4-Core 140
8-Core 132
18% 136 Pts
64-Core 146
9% 146 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21FA) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4425
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.65% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 2.7
3% 2.53 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.2
2% 2.77 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.65%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OSC mSATA 256GB
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0927A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 160 187 146 134 151 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.7% Below average
Read 167
Write 171
Mixed 136
SusWrite 153
35% 157 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 29.2
4K Mixed 7.9
37% 15 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 64.2
72% 120 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 68%
Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ152 320GB
44GB free
Firmware: 0002YXM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 67 70 66 69 70 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 89.5
Write 86.7
Mixed 60
SusWrite 68.2
56% 76.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.7 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
9.96% Terrible
MC Read 3
MC Write 3.3
MC Mixed 3.2
9% 3.17 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 2.5
7% 2.47 GB/s
Latency 182
22% 182 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 9.96%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 23258BA Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 23258BA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback