Supermicro X9DAi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics97.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive131% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemSupermicro X9DAi  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DAi
Memory120.7 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '23 at 15:37
Run Duration255 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 79.4
1-Core 69.6
2-Core 153
60% 101 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 648
58% 488 Pts
64-Core 2,077
128% 2,077 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
Gigabyte(1458 4073) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 535.98
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.7% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 116
Parallax 120
103% 121 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 103
Splatting 88.1
88% 110 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 4TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 558 543 564 563 536 566 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 1,101
Write 636
Mixed 582
SusWrite 555
160% 718 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 47.3
4K Mixed 35.1
115% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 438
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 399
297% 394 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 131%
Great: 487%
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
250GB free
Firmware: SAFM13.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 162 161 162 166 162 MB/s
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.1% Above average
Read 239
Write 214
Mixed 185
SusWrite 162
45% 200 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 48.6
4K Mixed 25.9
90% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 126
114% 173 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 102%
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB
192GB free
Firmware: 731030WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1887 1931 1212 233 239 273 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
227% Outstanding
Read 2,306
Write 1,997
Mixed 1897
SusWrite 962
401% 1,791 MB/s
4K Read 46.1
4K Write 76.3
4K Mixed 51.2
176% 57.9 MB/s
DQ Read 607
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 437
338% 468 MB/s
Poor: 237%
This bench: 227%
Great: 633%
CT2000BX500SSD1 2TB
890GB free
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 163 163 163 168 163 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.3% Average
Read 278
Write 42.3
Mixed 40.8
SusWrite 164
29% 131 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 22.7
4K Mixed 0.7
57% 17.5 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 27.1
DQ Mixed 0.2
29% 75.2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 99%
Seagate ST14000NM0018-2H4101 14TB
11.5TB free
Firmware: SN04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 241 237 238 238 239 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 33% Great: 130%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36JSF1G72PZ-1 36JSF1G72PZ-1 36JSF1G72PZ-1 36JSF1G72PZ-1 36JSF1G72PZ-1 36JSF1G72PZ-1 36JSF1G72PZ-1 36JSF1G72PZ-1 Samsung M393B1K70DH0- Samsung M393B1K70DH0- Samsung M393B1K70DH0- Sa... 128GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
95.8% Outstanding
MC Read 44.8
MC Write 36.8
MC Mixed 35.5
112% 39 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 6.9
26% 8.97 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X9DAi Builds (Compare 89 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier

System: Supermicro X9DAi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $247
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback