HP Compaq Pro 6300 MT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6300 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 339A
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150318
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateJun 14 '23 at 13:42
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400S-$70
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400S CPU @ 2.50GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Memory 78.7
1-Core 67.9
2-Core 130
56% 92.1 Pts
4-Core 159
8-Core 197
23% 178 Pts
64-Core 209
13% 209 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 68%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$58
313GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 79 98 131 126 134 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 141
Write 146
Mixed 80.6
SusWrite 105
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP698650-154-KEB Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
41.5% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 12.7
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 11.6
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 82.9
48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Pro 6300 MT Builds (Compare 1,918 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6300 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $84
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback