Gigabyte GA-Z270-HD3P-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics41.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z270-HD3P
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270-HD3P-CF  (all builds)
Memory7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '23 at 12:24
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 80.7
1-Core 119
2-Core 221
79% 140 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 587
60% 486 Pts
64-Core 544
34% 544 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 90%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3655 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 535.98
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.2% Average
Lighting 46.4
Reflection 17.3
Parallax 122
38% 61.8 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 33.7
Splatting 24.3
48% 64.5 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 106%
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
2.83% Terrible
Lighting 4.9
Reflection 0.8
Parallax 1.9
4% 2.53 fps
MRender 0.6
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 0.6
1% 0.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.83%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5042
Write 4,448
Mixed 4,532
1,042% 4,674 MB/s
4K Read 134
4K Write 89.7
4K Mixed 93
369% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 251
DQ Mixed 298
226% 307 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
Netac NVMe SSD 250GB
113GB free
Firmware: T0918A0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1160 1083 1163 738 123 121 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
145% Outstanding
Read 1,382
Write 1,102
Mixed 866
SusWrite 731
228% 1,020 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 66.8
4K Mixed 21.5
108% 39.4 MB/s
DQ Read 326
DQ Write 269
DQ Mixed 308
228% 301 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 145%
Great: 292%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
82GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 117 117 117 117 118 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 98.8
Write 94.5
Mixed 52.6
SusWrite 117
66% 90.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 109%
WD WD4003FRYZ-01F0DB0 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 217 221 221 216 225 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 231
Write 221
Mixed 93
SusWrite 221
140% 191 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 1.6
332% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 130%
Great: 137%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 029E CMK8GX4M1A2666C16 16GB
2533, 2533 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
61.7% Good
MC Read 23.8
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 19.4
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 17.9
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 79.3
50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270-HD3P-CF Builds (Compare 1,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270-HD3P-CF - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $633
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback