Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8565U 81,207 User benchmarks, average bench 55% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	51.4% Above average	Memory 74.4 1-Core 49.9 2-Core 102 48% 75.5 Pts	4-Core 164 8-Core 182 23% 173 Pts	64-Core 174 11% 174 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 178,291 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Legend(17AA 5072) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9749 Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	2.74% Terrible	Lighting 3.3 Reflection 4.1 Parallax 3.4 3% 3.6 fps	MRender 3.4 Gravity 2.9 Splatting 3.9 3% 3.4 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.74% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500M8480G 480GB 1,552 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 393GB free (System drive) Firmware: 003056RI SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 214 139 148 137 167 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	54.4% Above average	Read 392 Write 342 Mixed 316 SusWrite 181 69% 308 MB/s	4K Read 18.4 4K Write 23.1 4K Mixed 18.6 64% 20 MB/s	DQ Read 206 DQ Write 149 DQ Mixed 167 127% 174 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 94%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB 294,991 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 931GB free Firmware: 05.01A05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 113 93 96 85 106 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	64.9% Good	Read 124 Write 115 Mixed 57.2 SusWrite 100 73% 99.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 5.7 4K Mixed 0.8 228% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 Kingston 9905700-026.A00G 16GB 147 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	55.8% Above average	MC Read 20.6 MC Write 21.7 MC Mixed 19.2 59% 20.5 GB/s	SC Read 8.7 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 13.7 38% 13.4 GB/s	Latency 91.7 44% 91.7 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 82%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-8565UIntelBench 55%, 81,207 samples	3x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	3x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	1x

RAM
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	1x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 86D3 SP008GBSFU240B02 16GBSamsungBench 72%, 5 samples	1x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 54,121 samples	1x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28