Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (78%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron G460 378 User benchmarks, average bench 39% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	28.2% Poor	Memory 50.5 1-Core 29.7 2-Core 39.2 28% 39.8 Pts	4-Core 37.2 8-Core 37.7 5% 37.5 Pts	64-Core 37.7 2% 37.7 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz) 150,891 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 308F) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.63% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 1.1 Parallax 1 0% 0.87 fps	MRender 1.5 Gravity 0.7 Splatting 1.6 1% 1.27 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.63% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SH00M128GB 128GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 101GB free (System drive) Firmware: HP22272P SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 156 203 198 206 161 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.8% Below average	Read 185 Write 175 Mixed 166 SusWrite 187 40% 178 MB/s	4K Read 17.6 4K Write 26.3 4K Mixed 9.1 52% 17.7 MB/s	DQ Read 87.3 DQ Write 78.1 DQ Mixed 16.7 31% 60.7 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT325S6CFR8C-PB Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 6GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1067, 1067 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	17.6% Very poor	MC Read 4.8 MC Write 6.2 MC Mixed 6.4 17% 5.8 GB/s	SC Read 4.6 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 5.6 16% 5.53 GB/s	Latency 159 25% 159 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron G460IntelBench 39%, 378 samples	1x
Core i3-3220TIntel $80Bench 55%, 2,218 samples	1x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	1x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1x

SSD
SH00M128GB 128GBBench 57%, 16 samples	2x

RAM
HMT325S6CFR8C-PB Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 6GBHynixBench 39%, 15 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16