Essentielb EB Dark'DESK 1004-1/B709

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics70.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive94.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemEssentielb EB Dark'DESK 1004-1/B709  (all builds)
Motherboardessentielb H81H3-EM2
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150717
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJun 13 '23 at 20:56
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
76.9% Very good
Memory 81
1-Core 119
2-Core 232
80% 144 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 574
60% 483 Pts
64-Core 582
36% 582 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Asus(1043 878A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 532.03
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.6% Very good
Lighting 87.4
Reflection 89.2
Parallax 81.4
71% 86 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 78
Splatting 72
70% 87.2 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 99 100 99 94 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 480
Mixed 400
SusWrite 116
83% 373 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 80.2
4K Mixed 50.3
166% 56.6 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 355
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 124%
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$165
298GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 430 412 443 445 434 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 480
Mixed 453
SusWrite 400
104% 460 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 83.7
4K Mixed 55
180% 60.5 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 357
269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 117%
Great: 136%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
253GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 239 240 248 249 249 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
83.4% Excellent
Read 261
Write 248
Mixed 246
SusWrite 231
56% 246 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 70.6
4K Mixed 49.4
160% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 193
146% 194 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 137%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
838GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 211 210 211 210 209 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 105
Write 169
Mixed 28.4
SusWrite 200
91% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2.1
384% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M2F8G64CB8HD5N-DI 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
58.1% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 16.9
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 19.1
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EB Dark'DESK 1004-1/B709 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Essentielb EB Dark'DESK 1004-1/B709

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $387
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback