User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 155%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics151% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive179% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHUANANZHI
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99 F8D
Memory59 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 13 '23 at 17:28
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 6800-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680R v4
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 75
1-Core 104
2-Core 205
72% 128 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 708
63% 536 Pts
64-Core 3,209
199% 3,209 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-XT-$650
MSI(1462 3951) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 23.5.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
151% Outstanding
Lighting 164
Reflection 231
Parallax 406
133% 267 fps
MRender 350
Gravity 157
Splatting 300
222% 269 fps
Poor: 165%
This bench: 151%
Great: 178%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
JAJP600M512GB 512GB
415GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0620A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 965 978 990 987 991 998 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
179% Outstanding
Read 1,580
Write 988
Mixed 905
SusWrite 985
249% 1,114 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 77.7
4K Mixed 21.7
122% 44.9 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 534
DQ Mixed 326
280% 405 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 179%
Great: 221%
Verbatim STORE N GO 16GB
10GB free, PID 0302
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 20 20 21 21 20 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Read 34.5
Write 1
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 19.8
16% 14.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.1
22% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2K40BB1-CRC M393A2K40BB1-CRC Micron 18ASF2G72PDZ-2G3B1 Micron 18ASF2G72PDZ-2G3D1 64GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
70.6% Very good
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 23
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 15.4
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 90.4
44% 90.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback