Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	53.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	63.5% Good	Memory 80.3 1-Core 88.5 2-Core 175 67% 115 Pts	4-Core 268 8-Core 289 37% 279 Pts	64-Core 298 18% 298 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% MSI(1462 3285) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 451.67 Performing below potential (77^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	53.2% Above average	Lighting 65.9 Reflection 66.4 Parallax 61.6 54% 64.6 fps	MRender 65.5 Gravity 67.9 Splatting 59.8 52% 64.4 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 56%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD5000AVDS-63U7B1 500GB 24,608 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 240GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.00A01 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 82.3 Write 45.6 Mixed 35.6 40% 54.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.3 64% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 52%
Dahua U176 64GB 54GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	Read 17.2 Write 6.7 Mixed 11.9 14% 11.9 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.4 27% 1.03 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 16GB 52 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	57.4% Above average	MC Read 20.4 MC Write 22.3 MC Mixed 18.4 58% 20.4 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 16.3 47% 16.3 GB/s	Latency 80 50% 80 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 60%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	210x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	69x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	61x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $77

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16