TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Priminfo P8H61-I

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive14.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPriminfo P8H61-I  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK P8H61-I
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 13 '23 at 14:43
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 93%

 PC Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3350P-$60
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
29.1% Poor
Memory 35.8
1-Core 27.8
2-Core 63.8
26% 42.5 Pts
4-Core 128
8-Core 140
18% 134 Pts
64-Core 134
8% 134 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑
This bench: 29.1%
 Great: 74%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900208
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 73 78 79 83 73 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
14.3% Very poor
Read 74.8
Write 71.9
Mixed 48.5
SusWrite 75.7
15% 67.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 9
4K Mixed 4.5
18% 6.1 MB/s
DQ Read 19.3
DQ Write 38.8
DQ Mixed 18.8
17% 25.6 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑
This bench: 14.3%
 Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
30.6% Below average
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 12
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 5.6
15% 5.3 GB/s
Latency 223
18% 223 ns
Poor: 25% ↑
This bench: 30.6%
 Great: 53%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical P8H61-I Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Priminfo P8H61-I

CPU
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples1x
Core i3-2120Intel  $75Bench 51%, 77,810 samples1x
GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples2x
SSD
Sata III 120GBIntensoBench 68%, 2,648 samples1x
RAM
M378B5673GB0-CH9 4GBSamsungBench 45%, 34 samples1x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback