Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	50.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	64.6% Good	Memory 84.5 1-Core 95.9 2-Core 188 71% 123 Pts	4-Core 249 8-Core 321 36% 285 Pts	64-Core 361 22% 361 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 83%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Unic2 S100-240 240GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: 7D101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 91 63 11 12 66 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	50.4% Above average	Read 343 Write 104 Mixed 219 SusWrite 48 39% 178 MB/s	4K Read 19.4 4K Write 43.9 4K Mixed 21.4 80% 28.2 MB/s	DQ Read 209 DQ Write 206 DQ Mixed 111 110% 175 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 82%
USB Disk 3.0 32GB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 23GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 36 39 36 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	24.5% Poor	Read 101 Write 3 Mixed 22.7 SusWrite 38.5 42% 41.4 MB/s	4K Read 6.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.6 43% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 27%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 Kingston 9905471-001.A01LF Micron 16KTF1G64AZ-1G9P1 12GB 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	28.3% Poor	MC Read 9.2 MC Write 8.8 MC Mixed 8.3 25% 8.77 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 9.5 SC Mixed 9.1 26% 9.23 GB/s	Latency 72.6 55% 72.6 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	43x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	34x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	28x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	11x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	9x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	9x

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $576

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16