3NOD TGS215TR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System3NOD TGS215TR  (all builds)
Motherboard3NOD TGS215TR
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120229
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 12 '23 at 16:41
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 76%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Turion II Ultra Mobile M640
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
27.3% Poor
Memory 46.6
1-Core 33.7
2-Core 47.8
29% 42.7 Pts
4-Core 48.1
8-Core 49.7
6% 48.9 Pts
64-Core 47.2
3% 47.2 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 5400
AMD(1002 68E1) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.84% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 2.1
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.47 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.4
1% 1.27 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.84%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 128GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW200326
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 166 185 184 181 204 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.6% Below average
Read 270
Write 23.9
Mixed 39.1
SusWrite 178
28% 128 MB/s
4K Read 9.2
4K Write 17.8
4K Mixed 5.5
30% 10.8 MB/s
DQ Read 56.5
DQ Write 125
DQ Mixed 16.6
34% 66 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD22G8002S PSD22G8002S 4GB
400, 400 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.6% Very poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 7.8
19% 6.67 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.8
17% 6.03 GB/s
Latency 174
23% 174 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback