One-netbook ONE XPLAYER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics15.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
17 months ago, 12 months ago.
SystemOne-netbook ONE XPLAYER  (all builds)
MotherboardONE-NETBOOK ONE XPLAYER
Memory6.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1200 x 1920 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220413
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateJun 12 '23 at 06:08
Run Duration77 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Memory 69.5
1-Core 163
2-Core 313
96% 182 Pts
4-Core 523
8-Core 782
81% 653 Pts
64-Core 928
57% 928 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
AMD(1002 0123) 3GB
Ram: 3GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Lighting 18.5
Reflection 20.1
Parallax 26.3
15% 21.6 fps
MRender 16.8
Gravity 22.3
Splatting 22.4
17% 20.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
One-netbook PCI-E 01TB SSD
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFM90.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 1,096
Write 1,779
Mixed 1,335
316% 1,403 MB/s
4K Read 50.1
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 68
225% 78.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,034
DQ Write 878
DQ Mixed 932
705% 948 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9HCNNNCPMALHRNEEE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB LPDDR4 clocked @ 4266 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
83.2% Excellent
MC Read 32
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 28.3
85% 29.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.8
SC Write 36.8
SC Mixed 26.1
81% 28.2 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ONE XPLAYER Builds (Compare 113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: One-netbook ONE XPLAYER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback