Lenovo 20MB000EMX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 20MB000EMX  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20MB000EMX
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220323
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 11 '23 at 23:52
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8850H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 85
1-Core 120
2-Core 239
83% 148 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 493
53% 421 Pts
64-Core 676
42% 676 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 2269) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1122
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.18% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 20.5
Parallax 6.5
5% 11.2 fps
MRender 11.6
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 10.6
8% 9.57 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.18%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
LENSE30512GMSP34MEAT3TA 512GB
424GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5.0412
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1701
Write 1,625
Mixed 1,155
332% 1,494 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 83.7
4K Mixed 51.3
166% 57.4 MB/s
DQ Read 808
DQ Write 631
DQ Mixed 520
443% 653 MB/s
Poor: 88% Great: 204%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
522GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,000
Write 1,852
Mixed 1,478
396% 1,776 MB/s
4K Read 45.8
4K Write 85.8
4K Mixed 57.3
188% 63 MB/s
DQ Read 830
DQ Write 443
DQ Mixed 587
450% 620 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
JetFlash Transcend 16GB
15GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 34.5
Write 4
Mixed 6.7
13% 15.1 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
27% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 859B CT16G4SFD8266.M16FE M471A1K43CB1-CTD 32GB
2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
68.9% Good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 20.7
71% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 19.6
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20MB000EMX Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

System: Lenovo 20MB000EMX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback