Intel X79F1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardIntel X79F1  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221018
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJun 11 '23 at 16:38
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
49.9% Average
Memory 69.4
1-Core 41.2
2-Core 82.2
42% 64.3 Pts
4-Core 165
8-Core 325
29% 245 Pts
64-Core 434
27% 434 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Nvidia(10DE 0825) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.33% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 6.2
Parallax 1.3
3% 3.8 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 4.4
Splatting 3.3
4% 4.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.33%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 1TB 1TB
790GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2704D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 222 225 227 225 225 MB/s
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.7% Above average
Read 240
Write 223
Mixed 218
SusWrite 225
51% 226 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 57.8
4K Mixed 11.2
87% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 14.1
54% 118 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 259%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT151R7TFR4C HMT151R7TFR4C HMT151R7BFR4C HMT151R7TFR4C 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
42.1% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 15.2
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 5.9
17% 6.03 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79F1 Builds (Compare 205 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Intel X79F1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback