Asrock A520M-HDV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock A520M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230410
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 11 '23 at 15:01
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Memory 74.7
1-Core 162
2-Core 317
98% 185 Pts
4-Core 545
8-Core 885
88% 715 Pts
64-Core 1078
67% 1078 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 107%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP S700 500GB
212GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2208XKR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 432 434 434 435 433 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 431
Mixed 370
SusWrite 433
97% 432 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 96.3
4K Mixed 38.3
142% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 291
DQ Mixed 199
158% 216 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 100%
Great: 90%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
338GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 5.8 5.2 6 6.8 7 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.73% Terrible
Read 3.5
Write 5.2
Mixed 3
SusWrite 6
3% 4.43 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 2.73%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C15/8G KHX2133C14/8G 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
62.3% Good
MC Read 26.6
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 23.4
62% 21.9 GB/s
SC Read 22.3
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 23.6
58% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 91.1
44% 91.1 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A520M-HDV Builds (Compare 722 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A520M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $115
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback