Acer Aspire XC-1760

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics28.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive170% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire XC-1760  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire XC-1760
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 11 '23 at 12:01
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400-$146
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Memory 84.3
1-Core 178
2-Core 316
104% 193 Pts
4-Core 589
8-Core 941
94% 765 Pts
64-Core 1,214
75% 1,214 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.6% Poor
Lighting 36.3
Reflection 39.9
Parallax 37.4
30% 37.9 fps
MRender 37.2
Gravity 37.6
Splatting 26.3
27% 33.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KINGSTON OM8PDP3512B-AA1 512GB
328GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0S03 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 996 521 290 295 293 292 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
170% Outstanding
Read 1198
Write 1,060
Mixed 1,068
SusWrite 448
211% 943 MB/s
4K Read 45.1
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 61.2
210% 75.5 MB/s
DQ Read 577
DQ Write 765
DQ Mixed 807
571% 716 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 170%
Great: 215%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$50
242GB free
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 429 445 447 454 456 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Read 325
Write 335
Mixed 345
SusWrite 440
82% 361 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 41.4
4K Mixed 27.2
82% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 122
140% 238 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 125%
Asmedia ASM1153E 1TB
772GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 172 175 179 172 178 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 176
Mixed 114
SusWrite 174
118% 161 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
219% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 102%
Great: 99%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
838GB free
Firmware: 1306
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 78 77 78 80 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 84.8
Write 40.3
Mixed 50.6
SusWrite 76.8
47% 63.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
120% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFRA32A.M4FF Micron 4ATF1G64AZ-3G2B1 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
92.2% Outstanding
MC Read 36.8
MC Write 31.6
MC Mixed 30
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 22.4
SC Write 40
SC Mixed 26.8
85% 29.7 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 85%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 21.5" 1920 1080 SAM0D1A S22F350
Typical Aspire XC-1760 Builds (Compare 190 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire XC-1760

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 117% - Outstanding Total price: $146
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback