Asrock 970A-G/3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics49.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock 970A-G/3.1  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 10 '23 at 19:52
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 80%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
32.9% Below average
Memory 47.1
1-Core 53.4
2-Core 98.7
39% 66.4 Pts
4-Core 108
8-Core 118
15% 113 Pts
64-Core 123
8% 123 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.4% Average
Lighting 61.7
Reflection 62.5
Parallax 84.4
50% 69.5 fps
MRender 64.7
Gravity 67.5
Splatting 47
48% 59.7 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 2TB
822GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0121A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 8.7 7.4 9.3 9.6 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 375
Write 195
Mixed 255
SusWrite 22.7
47% 212 MB/s
4K Read 8.5
4K Write 26.8
4K Mixed 13.3
44% 16.2 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 207
DQ Mixed 33.2
71% 146 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-14900CL10-8GBXL F3-12800CL10-8GBXL 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
35.7% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 14.1
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 11.5
26% 9.27 GB/s
Latency 172
23% 172 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970A-G/3.1 Builds (Compare 353 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970A-G/3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $269
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback