Asus Z170-AR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics59.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z170-AR  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime6.8 Days
Run DateJun 10 '23 at 14:05
Run Duration322 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 87%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$59
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
25.3% Poor
Memory 25.9
1-Core 82.5
2-Core 106
39% 71.6 Pts
4-Core 135
8-Core 186
20% 160 Pts
64-Core 164
10% 164 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
Zotac(19DA 1394) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 535.98
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
59.5% Above average
Lighting 79.7
Reflection 96.6
Parallax 90.8
65% 89 fps
MRender 71
Gravity 44.6
Splatting 62.9
49% 59.5 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Addlink M.2 PCIE G3x4 NVMe 1TB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM32.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 435
Write 1735
Mixed 539
206% 903 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 67.4
4K Mixed 41.2
120% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 842
DQ Write 400
DQ Mixed 491
399% 578 MB/s
Poor: 133% Great: 287%
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134
17GB free
Firmware: MU02
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 405
Write 389
Mixed 322
83% 372 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 72.8
4K Mixed 39.2
132% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 252
217% 320 MB/s
Poor: 69% Great: 113%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$83
65GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 96 96 97 96 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 145
Write 134
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 95.7
73% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2
364% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 110%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
34GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 65 64 65 64 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Read 69.1
Write 56.4
Mixed 55.8
SusWrite 63.6
45% 61.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 76%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
161GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 88 89 91 91 91 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 82
Write 73.4
Mixed 51.7
SusWrite 89.9
55% 74.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 51%
WD WD3000GLFS-01F8U0 300GB
3GB free
Firmware: 03.03V01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 84.7
Write 82.1
Mixed 61.8
57% 76.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
223% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 68%
ST325041 0AS 250GB
136GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Read 50.7
Write 35.8
Mixed 31
SusWrite 38.5
51% 39 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.8
58% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 18%
WD My Book 25ED 4TB
115GB free, PID 25ed
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 207
Write 175
Mixed 103
194% 162 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 11
4K Mixed 1
499% 12.2 MB/s
DQ Read 0.6
DQ Write 12.4
DQ Mixed 1.1
461% 4.7 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2133C14D4/8G KHX2133C14/8G 16GB
1867, 1867 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
41% Average
MC Read 14
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 7.4
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 18.6
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 280
14% 280 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 41%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170-AR Builds (Compare 1,445 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170-AR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $578
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback