Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri) 19,471 User benchmarks, average bench 40% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	23.9% Poor	Memory 45 1-Core 14.9 2-Core 17.9 20% 25.9 Pts	4-Core 18.1 8-Core 37.6 3% 27.8 Pts	64-Core 29.6 2% 29.6 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 48%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD32 00AVJS-63B6A 320GB 103 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 252GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 11 11 12 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	12.1% Very poor	Read 30.2 Write 34.2 Mixed 30.9 SusWrite 11.8 20% 26.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.2 49% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 59%
Maxtor 6Y080L0 82GB-$60 1,347 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 5GB free Firmware: YAR41BW0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 17 20 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	12.6% Very poor	Read 24.8 Write 33.1 Mixed 23.7 SusWrite 18.6 19% 25 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 114% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 12.6% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 1024, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	8.45% Terrible	MC Read 3 MC Write 2.3 MC Mixed 2.6 8% 2.63 GB/s	SC Read 1.9 SC Write 2.6 SC Mixed 0.9 5% 1.8 GB/s	Latency 180 22% 180 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.45% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 42%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Athlon II X2 260AMDBench 42%, 5,317 samples	7x
Athlon II X2 245AMDBench 41%, 6,247 samples	5x
Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)AMDBench 40%, 19,471 samples	4x

GPU
GeForce 7025 / nForce 630aNvidiaBench 0%, 5,527 samples	13x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	5x
GeForce 9500 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 27,834 samples	3x

SSD
LCS-256L9S- 256GBLiteonitBench 60%, 2 samples	3x
0 240GBCt240bx5Bench 50%, 1,468 samples	2x
870 EVO 500GBSamsungBench 69%, 18 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16