Huoshen X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics69.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive267% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardHuoshen X79  (all builds)
Memory29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191022
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 10 '23 at 04:56
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
65.2% Good
Memory 79.8
1-Core 57.5
2-Core 141
56% 92.8 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 547
48% 410 Pts
64-Core 860
53% 860 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Zotac(19DA 4535) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
69.8% Good
Lighting 86.5
Reflection 13.6
Parallax 81.6
70% 60.6 fps
MRender 109
Gravity 78.8
Splatting 70.1
68% 85.9 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
817GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1845 1845 1839 1893 1884 1895 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
267% Outstanding
Read 2,044
Write 1,965
Mixed 1,804
SusWrite 1,867
433% 1,920 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 70
4K Mixed 50.7
169% 54.9 MB/s
DQ Read 506
DQ Write 359
DQ Mixed 458
335% 441 MB/s
Poor: 249%
This bench: 267%
Great: 623%
Kingdian S400 480GB
178GB free
Firmware: R1108A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 219 167 37 2.3 13 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.8% Poor
Read 212
Write 200
Mixed 14.7
SusWrite 109
30% 134 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 8.4
4K Mixed 0.6
39% 10.4 MB/s
DQ Read 90
DQ Write 13.3
DQ Mixed 5.4
16% 36.2 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 100%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
11GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 7.2 6.4 6.2 7.2 7.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 26.4
Write 1.5
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 7
8% 9.15 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Mixed 0
28% 2.55 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 48.1
MC Write 36.6
MC Mixed 42.8
121% 42.5 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 10
34% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 80.9
49% 80.9 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Huoshen X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback