Asus PRIME H310M-E R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H310M-E R2.0  (all builds)
Memory2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190813
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 07 '23 at 16:38
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User ECU-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$243
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
58.8% Above average
Memory 26.8
1-Core 125
2-Core 236
64% 129 Pts
4-Core 485
8-Core 739
76% 612 Pts
64-Core 845
52% 845 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2121
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
4.39% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 8.4
Parallax 8
5% 7.67 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.2
2% 3.57 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.39%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03200000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 102 55 54 55 56 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 357
Write 306
Mixed 282
SusWrite 114
59% 265 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 52.5
4K Mixed 32.1
110% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 122
100% 142 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Avant W641GU42J9266NC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
21.7% Poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 6.9
23% 8.07 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 4.2
15% 5.1 GB/s
Latency 274
15% 274 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H310M-E R2.0 Builds (Compare 6,449 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-E R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $343
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback