Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-DS2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics57.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive23.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A88XM-DS2  (all builds)
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140124
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 07 '23 at 15:17
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-6320 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 28.4
2-Core 35.4
16% 31.9 Pts
4-Core 47.9
8-Core 53.3
7% 50.6 Pts
64-Core 52.9
3% 52.9 Pts
Poor: 28% Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 472.12
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.3% Above average
Lighting 66.7
Reflection 40.8
Parallax 90.6
54% 66 fps
MRender 92.6
Gravity 78.4
Splatting 65.1
63% 78.7 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
371GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR054
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 53 112 152 145 165 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23.7% Poor
Read 186
Write 184
Mixed 35.1
SusWrite 130
30% 134 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 9.6
4K Mixed 0.5
13% 5.07 MB/s
DQ Read 93.1
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 28.7
43% 80.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
434GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 97 76 96 93 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 105
Write 93.4
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 92.9
64% 86.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 51264Y106G 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
MC Read 1.3
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 5.3
10% 3.33 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 3.3
14% 4.93 GB/s
Latency 1,111
4% 1,111 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A88XM-DS2 Builds (Compare 170 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-DS2 - $75

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $283
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback