Asus Z170M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 139%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics181% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive206% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z170M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory19.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180516
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJun 07 '23 at 05:56
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User PSE-User
Background CPU 53%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 120
2-Core 223
80% 142 Pts
4-Core 408
8-Core 602
63% 505 Pts
64-Core 626
39% 626 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$550
Palit(1569 2206) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
181% Outstanding
Lighting 258
Reflection 239
Parallax 264
210% 254 fps
MRender 300
Gravity 222
Splatting 167
181% 230 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 181%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-e2000r 1024G 1TB
816GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1082 1297 940 962 953 957 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
206% Outstanding
Read 1,188
Write 2,246
Mixed 1,440
SusWrite 1,032
335% 1,476 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 63
199% 70.4 MB/s
DQ Read 906
DQ Write 578
DQ Mixed 827
594% 770 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 206%
Great: 273%
Samsung HD153WI 1.5TB
961GB free
Firmware: 1AN10003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 100 100 101 100 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 80.7
Write 39.8
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 101
50% 67.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2133 C14 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.3% Above average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 15.4
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 16.2
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,249 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus Z170M-PLUS - $87

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $507
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback