HP 750-514

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive43% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP 750-514  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82F1
Memory15.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20170330
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJun 06 '23 at 22:42
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Memory 87.9
1-Core 114
2-Core 219
80% 140 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 613
63% 506 Pts
64-Core 606
38% 606 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
HP(103C 8903) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4150 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 532.03
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 117
Parallax 127
111% 126 fps
MRender 152
Gravity 102
Splatting 87.5
90% 114 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 103%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 2000GB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: UP4504RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 81 50 59 74 48 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
43% Average
Read 387
Write 342
Mixed 276
SusWrite 88
61% 273 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 33.3
4K Mixed 12.4
58% 20.7 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 94.6
DQ Mixed 33.2
45% 82 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 43%
Great: 56%
Samsung MZ7LN128HCHP-000H1 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: EMT02H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 45 41 31 36 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 436
Write 83.5
Mixed 111
SusWrite 38.9
36% 167 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 66.4
4K Mixed 24.5
109% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 71.5
DQ Mixed 97
104% 182 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD416G32002 8502 PSD416G32002 32GB
2400, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
81.1% Excellent
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 31.5
MC Mixed 25.6
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 25.3
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 750-514 Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP 750-514

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback