Acer Swift SFX16-52G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics20.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive345% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Swift SFX16-52G  (all builds)
MotherboardADL Penguin_ADP
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 06 '23 at 22:40
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1260P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Memory 58.5
1-Core 171
2-Core 326
95% 185 Pts
4-Core 622
8-Core 956
98% 789 Pts
64-Core 1,406
87% 1,406 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Acer(1025 1611) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1331
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
20.8% Poor
Lighting 24.5
Reflection 38.7
Parallax 28.6
20% 30.6 fps
MRender 25.7
Gravity 36.9
Splatting 21.7
22% 28.1 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_3400_MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB
428GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7MA000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2933 1961 2165 3123 1731 686 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
345% Outstanding
Read 2,695
Write 2,666
Mixed 1,832
SusWrite 2,100
522% 2,323 MB/s
4K Read 45.8
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 64.2
208% 72.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,172
DQ Write 799
DQ Mixed 961
724% 977 MB/s
Poor: 202%
This bench: 345%
Great: 435%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3LKBKB@BM-MGCP 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
119% Outstanding
MC Read 49.8
MC Write 43.9
MC Mixed 43.6
131% 45.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 43.5
SC Mixed 24.1
81% 28.4 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 119%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Swift SFX16-52G Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Acer Swift SFX16-52G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback