Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	35.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 K 875-$180 2,354 User benchmarks, average bench 70% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	66.3% Good	Memory 86.1 1-Core 85.7 2-Core 138 64% 103 Pts	4-Core 256 8-Core 347 38% 302 Pts	64-Core 364 22% 364 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 66.3% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro Duo 197 User benchmarks, average bench 39% AMD(1002 1336) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1243 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09 Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	35.5% Below average	Lighting 40.6 Reflection 56.3 Parallax 65.5 33% 54.1 fps	MRender 57.4 Gravity 52.3 Splatting 41.3 40% 50.3 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 42%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 884GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 203 207 205 218 210 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	60.9% Good	Read 228 Write 220 Mixed 206 SusWrite 208 49% 216 MB/s	4K Read 29.2 4K Write 49 4K Mixed 36 116% 38.1 MB/s	DQ Read 36.7 DQ Write 79 DQ Mixed 47.4 39% 54.4 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 32GB 5,781 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	40.1% Average	MC Read 14.9 MC Write 13.4 MC Mixed 12.7 39% 13.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.4 SC Write 9.9 SC Mixed 12 31% 10.8 GB/s	Latency 71.2 56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 101%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 15%

Surfboard

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $489

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16