Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IHRB_FA506IHRB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics46.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive136% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IHRB_FA506IHRB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA506IHRB
Memory16.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221228
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 06 '23 at 20:55
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Memory 81.4
1-Core 133
2-Core 260
87% 158 Pts
4-Core 499
8-Core 834
81% 667 Pts
64-Core 1,030
64% 1,030 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Asus(1043 16ED) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.24.02
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
46.1% Average
Lighting 59.6
Reflection 73.9
Parallax 50
49% 61.2 fps
MRender 64.4
Gravity 48.2
Splatting 42.7
41% 51.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 45%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GB
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 880 1014 289 159 159 138 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 1,140
Write 1,093
Mixed 980
SusWrite 440
205% 913 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 58.1
4K Mixed 42.2
139% 45.4 MB/s
DQ Read 618
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 559
383% 481 MB/s
Poor: 104%
This bench: 136%
Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C20S4/16G Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2R1 24GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
MC Read 34.8
MC Write 32.1
MC Mixed 30
92% 32.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 20.5
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 78
51% 78 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IHRB_FA506IHRB Builds (Compare 149 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IHRB_FA506IHRB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback