Asus PRIME A320M-K/BR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K/BR  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 06 '23 at 16:22
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Memory 80
1-Core 112
2-Core 223
77% 138 Pts
4-Core 408
8-Core 631
64% 519 Pts
64-Core 818
51% 818 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1250 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.5.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
15.3% Very poor
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 59.2
Parallax 80.1
0% 46.5 fps
MRender 59.9
Gravity 64.8
Splatting 43.7
45% 56.1 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
343GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 429 80 304 4.4 3.4 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 508
Write 411
Mixed 426
SusWrite 166
84% 378 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 84.1
4K Mixed 0.3
94% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 212
DQ Write 4.3
DQ Mixed 0.3
27% 72.2 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 92%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
27GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 96 90 88 88 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 131
Write 132
Mixed 71.8
SusWrite 91.1
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
173% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
45.6% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 14.1
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 15.5
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 80.6
50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K/BR Builds (Compare 940 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $233
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback