Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 8.25%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

11 months ago, 11 months ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-1450 APU 37 User benchmarks, average bench 23% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	8.25% Terrible	Memory 9.79 1-Core 14.3 2-Core 26.6 10% 16.9 Pts	4-Core 37.1 8-Core 48.3 5% 42.7 Pts	64-Core 47.1 3% 47.1 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 8.25% Great: 28%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 8250 1,387 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Zotac(19DA B208) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.22% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 2.3 Parallax 1.9 1% 1.83 fps	MRender 1.7 Gravity 1.3 Splatting 2.4 2% 1.8 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.22% Great: 1%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35 20,420 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	Read 241 Write 249 Mixed 176 50% 222 MB/s	4K Read 9.6 4K Write 16.7 4K Mixed 14.5 42% 13.6 MB/s	DQ Read 86 DQ Write 76 DQ Mixed 81.7 61% 81.2 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 110%
Intenso Alu Line 64GB 369 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 58GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 18.6 Write 9.8 Mixed 10.2 15% 12.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.8 55% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GB 44,908 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	8.59% Terrible	MC Read 3.4 MC Write 2.5 MC Mixed 3.1 9% 3 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 2 SC Mixed 2.6 7% 2.3 GB/s	Latency 406 10% 406 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 8.59% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16