Ibuypower INTEL

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 323%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 309%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics375% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemIbuypower INTEL  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte B660 DS3H AC DDR4-Y1
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211217
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJun 06 '23 at 00:41
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400F-$120
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Memory 78.4
1-Core 164
2-Core 306
98% 183 Pts
4-Core 543
8-Core 931
89% 737 Pts
64-Core 1,113
69% 1,113 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,756
CLim: 3135 MHz, MLim: 5350 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 532.03
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
375% Outstanding
Lighting 591
Reflection 731
Parallax 652
482% 658 fps
MRender 534
Gravity 579
Splatting 298
368% 470 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 375%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid WD Blue SN570 50 500GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2341
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,018
Write 1,326
Mixed 1155
262% 1,166 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 62.1
4K Mixed 33.6
111% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 929
DQ Mixed 420
369% 528 MB/s
Poor: 124% Great: 207%
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 980 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 5B2Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2324 2171 2324 1877 1987 2160 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
251% Outstanding
Read 1,239
Write 2,007
Mixed 1,438
SusWrite 2,140
388% 1,706 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 45.4
4K Mixed 31.7
97% 32.9 MB/s
DQ Read 493
DQ Write 1,329
DQ Mixed 973
725% 932 MB/s
Poor: 134%
This bench: 251%
Great: 467%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
MC Read 37.5
MC Write 36
MC Mixed 34.7
103% 36.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 29.7
SC Mixed 23.9
69% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 83.6
48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical INTEL Builds (Compare 7,533 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 207%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 229%
UFO

System: Ibuypower INTEL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $1,068
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback