Positivo VJF155

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.69% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive48.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPositivo VJF155  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo VJF155
Memory5.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161026
Uptime26.1 Days
Run DateJun 05 '23 at 18:13
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 64%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
48.7% Average
Memory 73
1-Core 64.2
2-Core 96.1
50% 77.8 Pts
4-Core 135
8-Core 213
21% 174 Pts
64-Core 212
13% 212 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Clevo(1558 2425) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.69% Terrible
Lighting 8
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 6.9
6% 5.9 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 12.5
7% 8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.69%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN128HAHQ-00000 128GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT2300Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 136 153 150 141 144 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 365
Write 333
Mixed 175
SusWrite 147
57% 255 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 37.4
4K Mixed 17.6
51% 20.3 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 175
137% 190 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 109%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: LVM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 121 127 127 127 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 103
Write 120
Mixed 46.7
SusWrite 126
72% 99.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.3
115% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AEDS1600W8G11-BNAD 079E TMT451S6BFR8A-PBHC 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.5% Below average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 12.2
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 12.6
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 94.6
42% 94.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VJF155 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo VJF155

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback