Dell Precision M4600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.94% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive88.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision M4600  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 08V9YG
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180914
Uptime5.8 Days
Run DateJun 05 '23 at 17:44
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2760QM-$130
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
67.7% Good
Memory 88.1
1-Core 85.2
2-Core 167
68% 113 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 339
38% 301 Pts
64-Core 342
21% 342 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD (ATI) FirePro M5950 Mobility Pro Graphics
Dell(1028 04A3) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2701.0
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
5.94% Terrible
Lighting 7.5
Reflection 8.3
Parallax 6.3
6% 7.37 fps
MRender 7.6
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 7.1
6% 6.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.94%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN512HCHP-000L1 512GB
362GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT04L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 305 281 321 317 311 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 457
Write 350
Mixed 274
SusWrite 304
78% 346 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 60
4K Mixed 35.6
120% 41.1 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 264
214% 303 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BF160B.M16 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
31.4% Below average
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 9.5
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 9.7
27% 9.6 GB/s
Latency 69.5
58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision M4600 Builds (Compare 566 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Precision M4600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $113
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback