Acer Veriton M4610

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.49% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive68.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Veriton M4610  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton M4610
Memory16.1 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110720
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 05 '23 at 15:15
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2320-$165
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Memory 79.4
1-Core 81.9
2-Core 138
61% 99.9 Pts
4-Core 121
8-Core 138
17% 129 Pts
64-Core 132
8% 132 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Gigabyte(1458 362B) 2GB
CLim: 1110 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.30
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
8.49% Terrible
Lighting 9.4
Reflection 12.1
Parallax 12.2
8% 11.2 fps
MRender 14
Gravity 12.4
Splatting 11.2
10% 12.5 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.49%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Midasforce 120GB 120GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VE0R5903
SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 328 273 174 121 153 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 442
Write 379
Mixed 319
SusWrite 228
76% 342 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 47.8
4K Mixed 28.6
98% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 88.9
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 131
102% 135 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 170 182 181 185 185 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 174
Mixed 76.1
SusWrite 178
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 103%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PBC HMT351U6EFR8C-PBC Samsung M378B5773DH0-CK0 Samsung M378B5773DH0-CK0 20GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.2% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 15.4
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 12.6
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Veriton M4610 Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton M4610

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $111
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback