Asrock N68-GS4 FX R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	43.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

11 months ago, 10 months ago.

Motherboard	Asrock N68-GS4 FX R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	13 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20151005
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 05 '23 at 00:17
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8300-$168 49,767 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	66.1% Good	Memory 87.7 1-Core 74.9 2-Core 134 61% 98.9 Pts	4-Core 242 8-Core 372 38% 307 Pts	64-Core 371 23% 371 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Asus(1043 8773) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 535.98 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	43.5% Average	Lighting 55.4 Reflection 56.2 Parallax 51.5 45% 54.4 fps	MRender 63.5 Gravity 49.1 Splatting 39.4 40% 50.7 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240 240GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 134GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF40 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 94 126 132 139 143 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.2% Below average	Read 228 Write 200 Mixed 173 SusWrite 125 41% 182 MB/s	4K Read 17.2 4K Write 17.6 4K Mixed 16.4 56% 17.1 MB/s	DQ Read 18.5 DQ Write 21 DQ Mixed 7.2 9% 15.6 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 49%
Excelsto r Technology 160GB 93 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 82GB free Firmware: P22O SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 60 59 60 60 60 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	38.6% Below average	Read 74.7 Write 69.3 Mixed 44.3 SusWrite 59.6 46% 62 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HX316C10F/8 1x8GB 591 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	46.1% Average	MC Read 19.2 MC Write 14.9 MC Mixed 15.1 47% 16.4 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 8.7 SC Mixed 12.1 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 69.8 57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 31: 0P 2R 7G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
31%	43%	21	542	443	60	23.8"	1920 1080	VIE2150 HORIZON Z21

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N68-GS4 FX R2.0 Builds (Compare 221 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-GS4 FX R2.0

CPU
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	101x
FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples	43x
FX-4300AMD $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples	25x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	44x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	37x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	14x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	15x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	8x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	7x

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 1x8GBUnknownBench 27%, 3,584 samples	11x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	10x
TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 16GBUnknownBench 39%, 564 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $134

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16