| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 25.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 33.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Sicomputer Productiva XS (all builds) |
| Motherboard | MSI H81M-P33 V2 (MS-7846) |
| Memory | 2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20140220 |
| Uptime | 0.3 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 04 '23 at 21:57 |
| Run Duration | 132 Seconds |
| Run User | ITA-User |
| Background CPU | 54% |
PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-4670T
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
|
57.5%
Above average
|
58% 95 Pts
|
25% 185 Pts
|
12% 199 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 270X-$199
MSI(1462 3030) 2GB
CLim: 1080 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.6%
Poor
|
27% 37.3 fps
|
24% 29.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SSDPR-CX400-256-G2 256GB
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 142 126 46 62 49 MB/s
|
33.6%
Below average
|
36% 163 MB/s
|
52% 17.9 MB/s
|
71% 98 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
237GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 90 85 86 87 87 MB/s
|
61.2%
Good
|
64% 87.9 MB/s
|
110% 0.9 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial ST51264BA160B.16F 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
47%
Average
|
47% 16.6 GB/s
|
35% 12.1 GB/s
|
52% 76.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Productiva XS Builds (Compare 71 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Sicomputer Productiva XS
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 11x |
| Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 9x |
| Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples | 7x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 22x |
| HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 9x |
| GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 7x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 83% - Excellent | Total price: $150 |