Lenovo 05692Z2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 05692Z2  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170327
Uptime108.9 Days
Run DateJun 04 '23 at 16:54
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
70% Very good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 96
2-Core 172
69% 117 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 442
47% 376 Pts
64-Core 450
28% 450 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 70%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8603) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.8% Poor
Lighting 36.4
Reflection 40.7
Parallax 41.8
30% 39.6 fps
MRender 37.4
Gravity 38.2
Splatting 27
27% 34.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
FTM28N325H 128GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0510A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 394 243 73 41 41 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
73% Very good
Read 496
Write 233
Mixed 394
SusWrite 182
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 73.8
4K Mixed 23.2
104% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 37.3
87% 175 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 73%
Great: 83%
Flash Disk 3.0 2TB
2TB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 4,319
Mixed 23.4
1,440% 2,171 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 1.8
108% 4.5 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B5273CH0- 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
83.7% Excellent
MC Read 32
MC Write 34.9
MC Mixed 30.5
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 12.4
40% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 05692Z2 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

System: Lenovo 05692Z2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $454
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback