Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 350-$199 14,351 User benchmarks, average bench 38% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	33.1% Below average	Memory 48.5 1-Core 50 2-Core 88.5 38% 62.3 Pts	4-Core 111 8-Core 71.3 13% 91.3 Pts	64-Core 60.9 4% 60.9 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4500 9,615 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sanyo(144D C07F) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.42% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 3.5 Parallax 1.5 2% 2.27 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 2 1% 1.57 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.42% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 119GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 189 205 206 217 224 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	48.5% Average	Read 210 Write 204 Mixed 197 SusWrite 206 46% 204 MB/s	4K Read 19 4K Write 28.5 4K Mixed 18.4 68% 22 MB/s	DQ Read 155 DQ Write 150 DQ Mixed 176 126% 160 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GB 10,285 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	20.9% Poor	MC Read 7.1 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 8.6 21% 7.33 GB/s	SC Read 5.1 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 6 15% 5.33 GB/s	Latency 166 24% 166 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 20.9% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 4500ATIBench 1%, 9,615 samples	24x
Mobility Radeon HD 545vATIBench 1%, 267 samples	1x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	2x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5673FH0-CF8 2x2GBSamsungBench 25%, 6,000 samples	5x
M471B2873FHS-CF8 M471B5673FH0-CF8 3GBSamsungBench 21%, 101 samples	3x
EBJ21UE8BDS0-AE-F 2x2GBElpidaBench 26%, 802 samples	2x

Value: 41% - Average

Total price: $237

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16