Acer Predator PT515-51

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics71.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Predator PT515-51  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Ghibli_CFS
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191002
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJun 04 '23 at 10:22
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 90
1-Core 114
2-Core 212
80% 139 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 451
51% 400 Pts
64-Core 380
24% 380 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Acer(1025 132D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 535.98
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.7% Very good
Lighting 85.3
Reflection 139
Parallax 87.3
70% 104 fps
MRender 129
Gravity 77.7
Splatting 79.2
76% 95.3 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 256GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10121000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,229
Write 1,480
Mixed 1,336
303% 1,348 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 83.7
4K Mixed 49.6
158% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 688
DQ Write 563
DQ Mixed 568
441% 606 MB/s
Poor: 118% Great: 213%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$75
30GB free
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,395
Write 1,889
Mixed 1,746
378% 1,677 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 87.7
4K Mixed 51.5
163% 57.6 MB/s
DQ Read 723
DQ Write 614
DQ Mixed 667
500% 668 MB/s
Poor: 168% Great: 297%
Generic MassStorageClass 8GB
7GB free, PID 0749
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 44
Write 4.7
Mixed 6.7
16% 18.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 2.6
130% 3 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFS8266.M8FD Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 16GB
2667, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
75% Very good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 21.9
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 30.9
SC Mixed 20.7
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 75%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PT515-51 Builds (Compare 686 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PT515-51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback