Biostar A960D+V3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
MotherboardBiostar A960D+V3  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180110
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateJun 04 '23 at 07:19
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core-$150
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
46.9% Average
Memory 69.3
1-Core 56.5
2-Core 87.5
46% 71.1 Pts
4-Core 143
8-Core 151
20% 147 Pts
64-Core 152
9% 152 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
Asus(1043 04C5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 820 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
4.71% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 8.6
Parallax 10.7
5% 8.63 fps
MRender 6.8
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 0.7
3% 4.67 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.71%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 240GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM11.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 91 56 42 54 23 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.5% Below average
Read 206
Write 144
Mixed 135
SusWrite 55.8
30% 135 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 28.9
4K Mixed 20.1
72% 23.2 MB/s
DQ Read 24.3
DQ Write 43.2
DQ Mixed 25.7
22% 31.1 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4GB DDR3 1333 1.5V 4GB DDR3 1333 1.5V 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
42.1% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 17.1
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 12.3
28% 9.87 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A960D+V3 Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Biostar A960D+V3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback