Gigabyte GA-B550 AORUS PRO V2

Performance Results


Gaming 135% UFO	Desktop 111% UFO	Workstation 122% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	350% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

12 months ago, 12 months ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-B550 AORUS PRO V2 (all builds)
Memory	27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20211001
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Jun 04 '23 at 06:55
Run Duration	279 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120 383,420 User benchmarks, average bench 96% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Memory 94.5 1-Core 171 2-Core 341 109% 202 Pts	4-Core 648 8-Core 976 101% 812 Pts	64-Core 1,123 70% 1,123 Pts
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 107%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 6700-XT-$480 20,231 User benchmarks, average bench 122% Gigabyte(1458 2331) ≥ 4GB Ram: 12GB, Driver: 23.5.2 Performing below potential (68^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	124% Outstanding	Lighting 137 Reflection 136 Parallax 287 112% 187 fps	MRender 253 Gravity 148 Splatting 203 164% 201 fps
Poor: 113% ↑ This bench: 124% Great: 129%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDS500G1X0E-00AFY0 500GB 15,095 User benchmarks, average bench 369% 232GB free (System drive) Firmware: 613200WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 1304 758 740 573 438 411 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	350% Outstanding	Read 3,141 Write 3,915 Mixed 2,861 SusWrite 704 596% 2,655 MB/s	4K Read 80.1 4K Write 242 4K Mixed 101 380% 141 MB/s	DQ Read 1,630 DQ Write 1,282 DQ Mixed 1395 1,060% 1,435 MB/s
Poor: 234% ↑ This bench: 350% Great: 494%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100 129,044 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 682GB free Firmware: SVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 488 491 492 491 491 492 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	139% Outstanding	Read 521 Write 494 Mixed 461 SusWrite 491 111% 492 MB/s	4K Read 49.9 4K Write 127 4K Mixed 68.1 230% 81.5 MB/s	DQ Read 387 DQ Write 370 DQ Mixed 377 284% 378 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 139% Great: 137%
ST8000NE0021-2EN112 8TB 87 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 235GB free Firmware: EN02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 109 111 109 110 109 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	16.4% Very poor	Read 179 Write 147 Mixed 75.7 SusWrite 109 28% 128 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 8.2 4K Mixed 0.7 8% 3.57 MB/s	DQ Read 0.3 DQ Write 14.9 DQ Mixed 3 4% 6.07 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 26%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 122 122 122 122 124 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	77.5% Very good	Read 148 Write 94.5 Mixed 77.5 SusWrite 122 81% 110 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 84%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$80 37,583 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 433GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 111 112 112 111 113 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	65.9% Good	Read 117 Write 82.9 Mixed 83.5 SusWrite 112 73% 98.9 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 205% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 87%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 1TB free Firmware: MX6OABS0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 134 135 136 134 137 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	70.5% Very good	Read 110 Write 117 Mixed 42.3 SusWrite 135 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 158% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 107%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 765GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 67 67 66 67 68 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	62.6% Good	Read 151 Write 91 Mixed 95.6 SusWrite 66.7 75% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.1 206% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 83%
Toshiba MG03ACA100 1TB 1,552 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2GB free Firmware: FL2H Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 74.7 Write 69.3 Mixed 40.5 46% 61.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.9 186% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BL16G36C16U4BL.M16FE 2x16GB 777 User benchmarks, average bench 109% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	MC Read 48.8 MC Write 27.2 MC Mixed 42.6 113% 39.5 GB/s	SC Read 33.4 SC Write 27.1 SC Mixed 44.1 100% 34.9 GB/s	Latency 58.6 68% 58.6 ns
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 138%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B550 AORUS PRO V2 Builds (Compare 1,977 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 125%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 114%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550 AORUS PRO V2

CPU
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	617x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $180Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	449x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $260Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	301x

GPU
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	164x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	162x
RTX 3080Nvidia $700Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	160x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	148x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $105Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	94x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $88Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	83x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	51x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	42x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	37x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 104% - Outstanding

Total price: $605

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16