Samsung 350V5C/351V5C/3540VC/3440VC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSamsung 350V5C/351V5C/3540VC/3440VC  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG 350V5
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 03 '23 at 19:20
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
50.2% Above average
Memory 72.4
1-Core 55
2-Core 99.4
48% 75.6 Pts
4-Core 163
8-Core 170
22% 166 Pts
64-Core 170
10% 170 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0D8) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
2.36% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 6.2
Parallax 2
2% 3.63 fps
MRender 3.4
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 3.9
3% 3.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.36%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 50 59 30 20 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 395
Write 335
Mixed 14.2
SusWrite 81.6
46% 207 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 34.3
4K Mixed 14.1
61% 21.6 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 16.8
DQ Mixed 4.2
26% 65.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-YK0 M471B5273EB0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
52.1% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 17.7
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 15.6
42% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 95.9
42% 95.9 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 350V5C/351V5C/3540VC/3440VC Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 350V5C/351V5C/3540VC/3440VC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $79
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback