Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506ICB_FA506ICB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506ICB_FA506ICB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA506ICB
Memory2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221228
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 03 '23 at 16:32
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
46.5% Average
Memory 54.2
1-Core 97
2-Core 107
52% 86.1 Pts
4-Core 212
8-Core 294
32% 253 Pts
64-Core 380
24% 380 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 16AD) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.14
Relative performance (0th percentile)
4.02% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 65.4
Parallax 8
3% 25.5 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 8.1
Splatting 10
7% 7.97 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 4.02%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GB
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 737 621 575 158 163 175 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Read 715
Write 668
Mixed 786
SusWrite 405
145% 644 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 43.5
4K Mixed 31.8
105% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 275
183% 222 MB/s
Poor: 104%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
25.8% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 9
27% 9.37 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 4.8
16% 5.63 GB/s
Latency 146
27% 146 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506ICB_FA506ICB Builds (Compare 416 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506ICB_FA506ICB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback