HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-ec1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive95.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-ec1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 87B1
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220317
Uptime8.1 Days
Run DateJun 03 '23 at 14:14
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
79% Very good
Memory 71.6
1-Core 131
2-Core 251
82% 151 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 808
77% 636 Pts
64-Core 962
60% 962 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 79%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
HP(103C 87B1) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.50.02.11
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
12% Very poor
Lighting 14.5
Reflection 52.2
Parallax 20.3
12% 29 fps
MRender 13.1
Gravity 15.2
Splatting 16.7
12% 15 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HAJD-000H1 256GB
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS4NFXV
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 136 135 133 135 134 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Read 884
Write 113
Mixed 226
SusWrite 132
73% 339 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 84.6
4K Mixed 38.4
143% 51.8 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 167
128% 177 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 192%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
161GB free
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 426 130 51 131 53 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
76% Very good
Read 470
Write 402
Mixed 407
SusWrite 197
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 96.9
4K Mixed 25.5
121% 49 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 254
DQ Mixed 39.6
75% 147 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 76%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE Kingston 9905711-035.A00G 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
76.9% Very good
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 26.4
80% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 27.6
SC Mixed 19.6
62% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 97.7
41% 97.7 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-ec1xxx Builds (Compare 2,465 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-ec1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback